Northern Border Collection III: Pike Creek 21yr Speyside Finish

Part III of the Northern Border Collection series: Pike Creek 21yr Old Canadian Whiskey finished in Speyside Single Malt Casks. I’ve never been a huge fan of single malt Scotch finishes (except the the Barrell Rum one recently: review here), but I’m willing to be opened minded for top blenders when I know it isn’t a gimmick.

IMG_0078

It’s medium straw colored, not unusual for Canadian Whiskey. Notes of toffee, caramel, roasted almonds, dark maple syrup and honeysuckle.

Easy down the hatch it goes, but perhaps a little too easy. The mouthfeel is good but not overly complex. The finish is medium length but keeps the enjoyable notes until the end.

This is another good Whiskey but not as multidimensional as I hoped. Fortunately the Speyside casks don’t overpower this whiskey, however, it just doesn’t excite me. It’s solid, but for the hype of this limited release, it doesn’t hold up. 84/100.

For a more in depth take on this Whiskey take a look at Mark Bylok’s review: http://whisky.buzz/blog/pike-creek-21-year-old-finished-in-speyside-single-malt-casks-review

https://www.jpwisers.com/ca/whisky-family/

http://www.pikecreekwhisky.com/s/agegate.php

http://www.canadianwhisky.org/reviews/pike-creek-21yo-speyside-finish-45.html

https://whiskyanalysis.com/index.php/2017/11/09/pike-creek-21-year-old-speyside-cask-finish/

https://distiller.com/spirits/pike-creek-21-year-finished-in-speyside-single-malt-casks

http://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/corby-showcases-canadian-whisky-with-the-northern-border-collection-rare-release-645682073.html

Advertisements

Northern Border Collection II: Lot 40 Cask Strength

Part II of my reviews of the Northern Border Collection: Lot 40 Cask Strength 12yr 55% abv. This is the one I’ve been most excited about as I’ve had samples from my friend Mark Bylok—and who doesn’t like a aged high proof rye?

IMG_0067

Copper/dark amber color just reaching out. Sweet, inviting nose of rock candy, cracked pepper, vanilla, baking spices, maple syrup and Christmas trees.

Seriously good on the palate. Coats everything, tingles the tongue, enjoyable but not overpowering warmth and a finish that keeps going on. Sweet and spicy flavors keep going and don’t drop off. The finish is epic… worth leaving in your mouth for a few seconds to get the full flavors before swallowing to realize the total potential.

This is a special whiskey. I am 1/3 through bottle number 2,251 of 4,968. This is better than this year’s Thomas H Handy, but not as good as 2014, 2015 or 2016. It’s in the upper echelons of ryes and deserves to be. I think this is similar but a touch better than the Kentucky Owl rye release. If you can snag one of these for less than 3x retail, it’s worth it. I hope they release it again next year. 96/100.

For a more in depth review, check out Mark Bylok’s Piece: http://whisky.buzz/blog/lot-no-40-100-rye-cask-strength-12-year-old-review

http://whisky.buzz/blog/the-insider-story-of-the-evolving-lot-no-40-canadian-rye-whisky

http://whisky.buzz/blog/eager-for-lot-no-40-cask-strength-heres-your-best-bet-on-getting-a-bottle

http://www.canadianwhisky.org/reviews/lot-no-40-cask-strength-55.html

http://www.lcbo.com/lcbo/product/lot-no-40-cask-strength-canadian-whisky/541326#.Wko7tYVh-Qs

Northern Border Collection I: Gooderham & Worts Little Trinity 17yr

Part of the Canadian only release Northern Border collection, Goderham & Worts Little Trinity is a 17yr Canadian Whiskey from rye, corn and wheat. Bottled at 45% abv.  Stay tuned to all four of the releases in the coming days.

IMG_0045(1)

Medium amber color. Smooth nose of baked bread, rock candy, stewed baby carrots with butter and brown sugar, and candy corn. Not a huge aroma from the glass. Much less spicy than I was expecting and less “Canadian” from normal Canadian whiskies but maybe that’s because it’s using more corn and wheat than normal.

After open for a while the classic Canadian flavors come out: maple syrup, vanilla, etc… like a Canadian pretending to be American, after a drink or two, the “eh” comes out and can’t be denied. It’s more enjoyable as a Canadian compared to an American imposter.

Enjoyable dram, super easy going down, very little heat. Sweet notes come through on the palate. Moderate oils and tannins, chill filtering removed a lot of them, but there still is enough there to ensure the finish is more than a minute. Finish tapers off without losing the sweet flavors which is nice.

Looks like this was probably aged in all used cooperage given the colors and flavors. It’s enjoyable but not something I would chase down. The CAD price is certainly right at retail, but impossible to get that price in the USA. Probably best to use for trade bait. 89/100.

For a more in depth analysis, check out Mark Bylok’s piece: http://whisky.buzz/blog/gooderham-worts-little-trinity-3-grain-blend-review-not-so-little-on-flavour

http://www.bcliquorstores.com/product/199822

http://www.canadianwhisky.org/reviews/gooderham-worts-little-trinity-17yo.html

http://whiskyanalysis.com/index.php/2017/12/05/gooderham-worts-17-year-old-little-trinity-three-grain/

https://tomoderawhisky.wordpress.com/2017/10/06/northern-border-collection-2017/

Northern Border Collection IV: J.P. Wiser’s 35yr

Saving what potentially is the best for last (and definitely the most expensive).

IMG_0122(1)

Very lightly colored, like most whiskies from the north.  The nose is without a doubt Canadian: vanilla extract, maple syrup, rock candy, pecan pie and a touch of allspice.

The taste is awesome and so much bigger than I expected with spices and flavor dominating every part of my mouth.  There is grip and oil and complexity in the mouthfeel; it is everything I hoped aged Canadian whiskey could be, but until this point, wasn’t.  The grip is especially surprising, and the finish builds higher to a crescendo before mellowing into a velvety end.

This is a special whiskey.  The finish is epic, the taste phenomenal, it’s just great.  It’s nothing like any of the Wiser’s I’ve ever had before–quite frankly, they were all pretty disappointing.  This has come out of nowhere and crushed the competition.  Well done Canada!  96.5/100.

For a more in depth review, check out Mark Bylok’s piece: http://whisky.buzz/blog/jp-wisers-aged-35-years-review-not-showing-all-of-its-age

https://www.jpwisers.com/ca/whisky-family/

http://www.canadianwhisky.org/reviews/jp-wisers-35-year-old-50-abv.html

http://www.lcbo.com/lcbo/product/jp-wiser-s-35-yo-canadian-whisky/541318#.Wko6VoVh-Qs

Orphan Barrel Entrapment

en·trap·ment
inˈtrapmənt,enˈtrapmənt/
noun
noun: entrapment; plural noun: entrapments
  1. the state of being caught in or as in a trap.
    “the feeling of entrapment grows as the roads close and the power goes out”
    • the action of tricking someone into committing a crime in order to secure their prosecution.
      “his style of investigation constitutes entrapment”

admiral-ackbar-its-a-trap

The title of the bottle pretty much tells you everything you need to know… you are basically being tricked into buying this because it has a big 25 on it.  Despite the fact that we know we are being entrapped by Diageo, we still overpay for the bottle anyway… on to the review:

Diageo’s Orphan Barrel Entrapment is the newest release and is a 25yr Canadian Rye from most likely Gimli, but could be Waterloo given they were distilling up to 1992  (Update: I have read online that it is in fact from Gimli).  They had admitted it is Crown Royal and decided to release it in this line instead of a special Crown Royal release or blend it into their normal product.

Extremely light colored. If it were Bourbon I’d guess it was six months old but it’s 25yrs old aged in used wood. The wood is probably so used there is nothing left to be absorbed into the distillate—I doubt the barrels were even reconditioned or recharred.

The nose is classic Canadian Rye, and that’s because it is. It’s Crown Royal and it’s smells just like their low end brand. Vanilla, Christmas tree and candy corn. Doesn’t smell like it’s been aged a lot. Reminds me a lot of older Canadian Club dusties that are easy to find, cheap and enjoyable.

The initial flavor is quite nice, smooth, sweet with vanilla and sugar candy and goes down easily. However there is no friendly heat, the mouthfeel is as thin as it can get and the finish ends before you know it. The taste is enjoyable but not complex.

Unlike some previous Orphan Barrel releases, this is totally drinkable. However it drinks well for a $40 bottle, not a MSRP $150 (I actually paid $199.99 plus tax because that was the only place around me that had it). I have several 70’s and 80’s dusty Canadian Clubs that taste better and I got for significantly cheaper. Prices affect ratings and this one is definitely not one you need to get but if you can find a pour for a reasonable price, maybe worth trying one glass.  DO NOT PAY UP ON SECONDARY FOR THIS! 86/100

4931761

 

Canadian Club 20yr: LCBO Pickup

I rated a different 20yr Canadian Rye a couple days ago, (https://newbourbondrinker.wordpress.com/2017/01/16/ninety-decades-of-richness-20-canadian-rye-whisky/) and this was the other bottle I bought from the LCBO.  This is a “Limited Edition” yet my bottle was number 301,802… so I’m not sure if by limited they mean less than a million bottles?  That’s not particularly limited to me… but what do I know?   Anyway, on to the review…

CC20 is a 80 proof Canadian Rye whiskey, which a dark amber color.  Much darker than the Nintey Rye I tasted a couple days ago, even though it had a higher proof.  The nose has mint, menthol, eucalyptus, graham crackers, and vanilla with medium heat.

Even though this is only 80 proof, there is a decent balance here with the spices, flavors and just enough heat to make it enjoyable.  There is a very smooth sweetness on it, that brings out the best of the Canadian Club, but with overlays of just enough complexity to make it a sipper rather than a mixer.  The finish is moderate, but the mouthfeel is lacking due to the low proof and chil filtering.

This one certainly is better than the Nintey rye from the other day, but one wonders what could have been if it was bottled at 120 proof instead of 80 without any chill filtering.  This could have been a really amazing rye if that was the case.  But in classic Canadian fashion, they water it down and screw it up.  Sorry, eh?  86/100.

img_01021