Shave and a haircut. Four quick reviews.

IMG_4381

Old Forester Rye. Super candied nose. Bananas Forester, banana split, skittles, marshmallows, graham crackers. Pretty easy down for 100 Proof. Medium mouthfeel. Nice hug. Finish does go a little bitter at the end though after a minute. Lots of hype here. Very good for $25, but not one I will bunker. 88/100.

1792 Full Proof NCF Single Barrel from 99 Bottles, 125 Proof. This one was around $55, not bad for a Barrel strength whiskey. Nutty, coconut, Necco wafers and waffles. Better mouthfeel and medium heat for the Proof. Mouthfeel builds with intensity in a good way with an enjoyable hug. Caramel and butter comes through at the end. Finish a solid two minutes. I’m generally not a 1792 fan, but this is the best one I’ve ever had. If you like 1792, this is a must get bottle. 92/100.

Barrell Dovetail finished in Dunn Cabernet barrels, 122.9 Proof. Incredible nose, so much going on. Brown sugar, Twix, cassis, totally enveloping. Crazy how easy this goes down for the Proof. I’m loving this Dunn cask finish. Finish 2-3 minutes. This is totally unique and special—tongue completely enveloped with tart cherry and tannic goodness. Glad I grabbed a couple at $80. Seeing it trade double that in secondary. 96/100.

Jefferson’s Presidential Select 16yr Twin Oak. Mixed reviews on this one, but going in unbiased. Strong wood nose but with waves of vanilla and charcoal. For 94 Proof the mouthfeel is better than expected. Interesting tastes but certainly quite a bit of oak. On the good side the finish goes for two minutes and improves instead of bowing out into bitterness. It’s a good Bourbon, but probably not worth the retail price. Worth a try at a bar. 92/100.

Advertisements

Very Disappointed in American Whiskey in NYC

I was excited to visit American Whiskey. I was going with clients so I knew I could expense it (within reason).  I arrived first and flipped through the book. Big selection and mostly the prices were reasonable.

I get to the BTAC selection. Prices reasonable so I order 5 pours each of WLW, Saz18 and GTS. The waitress leaves for ten to fifteen minutes before coming back saying they are out of all of them and they only have that Handy. I love Handy but it’s not worth the same as the other three but I still order a round.  She also didn’t know which vintage, because the profile has varied dramatically from year to year.

On the way to the restroom I run into one of the managers and express my frustration that several of the whiskies I ordered were still listed on the menu. He said it costs too much money to update the menu and that they get BTAC every year so they don’t cross them out or reprint them. I’m thinking to myself…. How much could 100 pieces of printed paper cost? It’s gotta be less than the single round of drinks I ordered first. And they lost 15 minutes of time where I could have ordered again.  One round of printing would have been paid for by just me and the extra round of 6x $40 THH’s I bought.

The waitstaff was extremely uninformed about most of the whiskey. The management didn’t seem to care about the patrons or the whiskey.

On the positive note, they do have a pretty decent collection and the prices aren’t crazy. Another pet peeve though… they have several pages that they will do 1oz pours but they refuse to do 1oz pours with others. I even asked to split them for my 6 people but wouldn’t. The bartender didn’t seem to get it. Painful.

Here’s a place with so much potential, decent selection, fair prices, but they fail on so many levels, largely due to laziness. They need to invest in the staff’s knowledge; they need to make the staff care about the customers; they need to have a proper inventory system so time isn’t wasted looking for whisky that no longer exists; they need to update their menus so customers don’t get frustrated (5 of the first 6 things I ordered were gone); they need to let all whiskies do 1oz pours and they need to find a way to make me come back. If I were an owner or manager I would want all these things fixed quickly and the best part is that none of these are insurmountable. It’s a big shame.  I’m happy to provide consulting services to them if they want.  They are leaving so much money on the table…

On TripAdvisor, I struggled whether to give this place two or three stars. The food was ok but not great, the service was pretty bad, the pricing was decent, the selection was very good but the extreme frustration I had with the menu, poor inventory control and the vast amount of time I wasted waiting for rounds after rounds because they were searching for whiskies that they didn’t know they were out of stock makes me go to a two star rating. I’d do 2.5 if I could but two is fine. Management should take a trip to Jack Rose in DC to see how they should operate their business.

Another sketchy liquor store… and $2500 Pappy 20 behind the counter!

If you are ever in midtown Manhattan at 55th & 8th ave… be sure NOT to stop at the local liquor store…. Westerly Liquor

IMG_4223(1)

$211 for CEHT Small Batch?  $200 for Stagg Jr? Seriously?

Foursquare 2004 vs 2005, Fred Minnick’s Top Rum of 2018

I’m completely #RumCurious thanks to Fred Minnick.  It will never take over Bourbon for me, but it’s great in its own right and worth adding to the cabinet. I loved Foursquare 2004 and I’m hoping the 2005 is as good because I’m down to my last inch of the 2004 bottle. 2005 looks darker.

img_3778

2004 nose is distinctly rum with spicy notes intertwined, pinapple, rose petal, vanilla and caramel.

2005 also is clearly rum with the coconut and molasses notes strong but there is a second wave that had bourbon butterscotch aromas clearly obtained from the cask. Amazing how it doesn’t feel hot even though 59% abv.

2005 The mouthfeel is delightful, focused on the tip of the tongue with rough sweetness and followed through down the middle just kissing the side of the mouth with a juiciness of tropical flavor. The finish is at least two minutes and never drops off. Very good.

2004 mouthfeel coats the whole mouth with significant time spent on the roof with more earthy focus rather than tropical. This may be because this bottle has been open for more than six months though. Like the 2005 this finish is long, but just under two minutes.

With a year that so many followups have not been as good as the year before, this is a pleasant surprise. The 2005 equals and maybe surpasses the 2004 just a little bit. 95.5/100.  Thank you Foursquare!

QUICK Review from a bar… Willett XCF, what PHC 12 should have been

This is basically what PHC12 should have been… the notes are literally identical in terms of items, but the intensity is the difference.  The whiskey is both good, but the orange isn’t a bomb, it’s subtle and woven well.  PHC12 is barely drinkable, this is very delightful (still not worth the secondary price though).  91/100.

https://newbourbondrinker.wordpress.com/2018/11/04/i-love-parkers-heritage-collection-i-dont-like-this-release-though/

img_3963